‘Abhishek Bachchan dies in Delhi 6’: Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra says ‘India hasn’t evolved’ to accept film’s original cut | Bollywood News


Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra’s Delhi 6 remains an intriguing work, as it was a piece of art that not only interrogates the cultural contours of India’s past but also hints towards the ethical and social trajectories that will influence its future. Yet, in an industry often governed by narrow commercial imperatives, such nuances often go unnoticed. When the film released in 2009, it was a box office failure. Over time, however, it has grown in stature, proving to be more incisive and relevant than many films of that decade. In an exclusive conversation with SCREEN, Mehra revealed that the country is still not ready for the film’s original version, which remains unreleased. This version, he says, opens with the death of the film’s protagonist, Abhishek Bachchan:

“The original film opens with the ashes immersion of Abhishek’s character in the Ganges. And over that, a voiceover comes, in Abhishek’s voice, saying, ‘These are my ashes.’ That’s how the story begins, and in the very opening frame you are told that your hero is dead.” Mehra continued: “That’s the original version. I still have it with me. That’s the one that went to the Venice Film Festival. They saw the film, they freaked out, they said ‘wow,’ and they gave it a lovely reception out there. And that’s why I call it the Venice cut, or the director’s cut. And Variety, the film magazine, gave it a front page, calling it ‘(un)Bollywood’.”

In the version of the film that was released, Abhishek Bachchan’s character survives, and the narrative concludes with a decidedly optimistic ending.

Also Read | Rishi Kapoor walked out of father Raj Kapoor’s film because he wanted to shoot at night, reveals Rakesh Om Prakash Mehra

On why he changed the ending for the Indian release, Mehra admitted: “Out of foolishness. Sheer foolishness. We filmmakers are foolish people, mad, foolish, all of that. I think there was so much dark humour in the film. There was so much going on that everybody who saw the cut said, ‘Leave it with some hope,’ and all that. And I fell for it. I shouldn’t have.”

Asked if he plans to release the original director’s cut someday, especially at a time when older classics are being re-released, Mehra remained uncertain: “I don’t know, I really don’t. If I were to re-release, I still feel the time isn’t right. I still feel the nation hasn’t evolved; in fact, we have gone down the hole in many ways. Of course, we have progressed in many ways as well, but I don’t know how to define that progress.” Another question that intrigues many was what prompted Mehra to make a film like Delhi-6 in the first place, after having done something like Rang De Basanti.

Mehra replied by saying that there was a silence that troubled him back then, a silence which had been accumulating around for ages, and that very silence compelled him to go on this journey. “My silence had to come through the film. And the fact that I was silent was the reflection of the entire nation being silent,” he explained. However, when the film released, it was heavily criticized by reviewers for several reasons, and eventually turned out to be a major box-office failure. Speaking about this, Mehra said:

“I felt the so-called critics went against me with a vengeance. They completely misinterpreted the film. A hit or a flop is another thing, that’s okay, it’s part and parcel of the business. I have seen the highs and lows of the box office, and one learns to accept it. But to have somebody’s work completely misinterpreted, and that is what is fed to the audience, taking away their own chance to decide, that’s another matter. Let them make their own mind, and they eventually did. It took them 20 years, but they did.”

Story continues below this ad

When asked what’s next for him, especially in a landscape like today’s where only certain kinds of films are getting greenlit, Mehra said he is dying to make a film on farmers. “See, whether people back it or not is not my problem. I will make the film I am dying to make. What I am feeling today is what I am going to make. I feel hugely about the farmers today, and I’m dying to make a film about them. The person who is feeding you is hanging himself, while the person making Coca-Cola is a billionaire. That’s a story to tell to underline today’s time.”

Anas Arif is a prolific Entertainment Journalist and Cinematic Analyst at The Indian Express, where he specializes in the intersection of Indian pop culture, auteur-driven cinema, and industrial ethics. His writing is defined by a deep-seated commitment to documenting the evolving landscape of Indian entertainment through the lens of critical theory and narrative authorship.
Experience & Career
As a core member of The Indian Express entertainment vertical, Anas has cultivated a unique beat that prioritizes the “craft behind the celebrity.” He has interviewed a vast spectrum of industry veterans, from blockbuster directors like Vijay Krishna Acharya, Sujoy Ghosh, Maneesh Sharma to experimental filmmakers and screenwriters like Anurag Kashyap, Vikramaditya Motwane, Varun Grover, Rajat Kapoor amongst several others. His career is characterized by a “Journalism of Courage” approach, where he frequently tackles the ethical implications of mainstream cinema and the socio-political subtext within popular media. He is also the host of the YouTube series Cult Comebacks, where he talks to filmmakers about movies that may not have succeeded initially but have, over time, gained a cult following. The show aims to explore films as works of art, rather than merely commercial ventures designed to earn box office revenue.
Expertise & Focus Areas
Anas’s expertise lies in his ability to deconstruct cinematic works beyond surface-level reviews. His focus areas include:

Auteur Studies: Detailed retrospectives and analyses of filmmakers such as Imtiaz Ali, Anurag Kashyap, and Neeraj Ghaywan, often exploring their central philosophies and creative evolutions.
Cinematic Deconstruction: Examining technical and narrative choices, such as the use of aspect ratios in independent films (Sabar Bonda) or the structural rhythm of iconic soundtracks (Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge).
Industrial & Social Ethics: Fearless critique of commercial blockbusters, particularly regarding the promotion of bigoted visions or the marginalization of communities in mainstream scripts.
Exclusive Long-form Interviews: Conducting high-level dialogues with actors and creators to uncover archival anecdotes and future-looking industry insights.

Authoritativeness & Trust
Anas Arif has established himself as a trusted voice by consistently moving away from standard PR-driven journalism. Whether he is interrogating the “mythology of Shah Rukh Khan” in modern sequels or providing a space for independent filmmakers to discuss the “arithmetic of karma,” his work is rooted in objectivity and extensive research. Readers look to Anas for an educated viewpoint that treats entertainment not just as a commodity, but as a critical reflection of the country’s collective conscience. … Read More

Click here to follow Screen Digital on YouTube and stay updated with the latest from the world of cinema.

© IE Online Media Services Pvt Ltd



Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments